This resolved issus is supported by Kotlin?

[ab908ab]

#879

[ab908ab]

This is working.

    @RouterOperations(
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUsers"),
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users/{userId}", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUser")
    )
    @Bean
    fun router(): RouterFunction<ServerResponse> = coRouter {
        GET("/api/v1/users", userHandler::findUsers)
        GET("/api/v1/users/{userId}", userHandler::findUser)
    }

But, this is not working.

    @RouterOperations(
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUsers"),
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users/{userId}", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUser")
    )
    @Bean
    fun router(): RouterFunction<ServerResponse> = coRouter {
        ("/api/v1").nest {
            ("/users").nest {
                GET("", userHandler::findUsers)
                GET("/{userId}", userHandler::findUser)
            }
        }
    }

[ab908ab]

By the way, this is working.

    @RouterOperations(
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users/{userId}", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUser")
    )
    @Bean
    fun router() = coRouter {
        ("/api/v1").nest {
            ("/users").nest {
                GET("", userHandler::findUsers)
                GET("/{userId}", userHandler::findUser)
            }
        }
    }

[ab908ab]

I tryed to add method param.
This is working!!

    @RouterOperations(
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUsers", method = [RequestMethod.GET]),
        RouterOperation(path = "/api/v1/users/{userId}", beanClass = UserService::class, beanMethod = "getUser", method = [RequestMethod.GET])
    )
    @Bean
    fun router() = coRouter {
        ("/api/v1").nest {
            ("/users").nest {
                GET("", userHandler::findUsers)
                GET("/{userId}", userHandler::findUser)
            }
        }
    }

method is required?

[bnasslahsen]

@908ab,

From your description, method should not be required.
But adding it is just a workaround, for your case.

This should be fixed for the next release.
You can already test the fix using the last SNAPSHOT;