Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSAL] Paper review: code2vec #272

Closed
vcoisne opened this issue Dec 10, 2018 · 18 comments
Closed

[PROPOSAL] Paper review: code2vec #272

vcoisne opened this issue Dec 10, 2018 · 18 comments

Comments

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor

vcoisne commented Dec 10, 2018

Management

This section will be filled by @campoy.

  • State: (proposed | writing | written | published)
  • Scheduled:
  • Link to post:

NOTE Please write in short lines so the review is easier to do.

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Dec 11, 2018

JFYI as we know from https://github.com/src-d/reading-club#past-papers - code2seq is a followup paper from the same authors with improved architecture and better results.

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Jan 18, 2019

@bzz should it be a code2seq paper review then? Do you or someone on your team has bandwidth to write it ?

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Jan 24, 2019

I would be happy to take a stab as this next week, before/after FOSDEM as it is a fairly low-hanging fruit (comparing e.g \w refactoring one) and if @creachadair agrees.

Writeup like that usually takes about 2 days of work.

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Jan 29, 2019

JFYI It's a really good time to do that right now, as https://code2seq.org/ was just released on top of already existing https://code2vec.org/

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Jan 29, 2019

@bzz awesome, so the plan is to publish the week after Fosdem?

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Jan 29, 2019

@bzz awesome, so the plan is to publish the week after Fosdem?

would be happy to start putting together a draft asap, but as mentioned in #272 (comment) - only after @creachadair 👍

@creachadair
Copy link

This sounds like a good idea to me. I do want to make sure we can still make timely progress on C# until that's stable, but otherwise I have no concerns.

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Feb 18, 2019

I have started the draft last week and I would say it's half-ready.
Will try to find time, finish and share it for early review by the end of this week.

@vcoisne do you want it on medium or a company blog?

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Feb 21, 2019

@bzz company blog + medium as a syndication platform :) Hopefully the migration to Ghost will be completed by then cc @marnovo

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Feb 22, 2019

Asking, as so far I only posted to one OR another - formatting is different and takes a lot of time for me for each of those.

So, please let me know if that is not the case, but so far I'm planing to:

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Feb 22, 2019

@bzz we can do the formatting for you. No need to submit a PR to https://github.com/src-d/blog, just share with me the gdoc and we'll take it from there!

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Mar 6, 2019

Initial blog post draft moved to DevRel/Blog on Team's GDrive.

It's still WIP but I hope to have some spare cycles next week to finish it!

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Mar 15, 2019

@bzz thanks! Did you get a chance to work on it some more ? should we review it ?

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Mar 19, 2019

Sorry for delay - this is the first time that I want to also include a notebook with the official code to reproduce the whole model right in the text of the blog post (in the spirit of the web-first, participatory science) and I've been spending all my cycles to get the Notebook running, which is now in reasonable state to share.

I will get back to the text and make a final pass over it this week and ping for review.
Thank you for the patience!

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Apr 3, 2019

At last! Had some time this week to work on this and feel that it's almost ready 🎉🎉🎉
The latest draft in this doc.

Mad props to @m09 @creachadair and @Jan21 for proof-reading, copy-editing and otherwise improving it - please let me know if any of you guys would be open to co-author it on company's blog this and I'll be happy to add you!

One last thing that is left to improve later this week (and before publication) - I need to update the notebook to reproduces code2seq with a prep-process dataset that I already have, otherwise it's too CPU intensive and never finishes with correct results on Collab.

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Jul 19, 2019

Per our conversation @bzz let's set the deadline to 7/29

Thanks

@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Jul 29, 2019

@vcoisne done, I think it is ready for the publication:

From what I can tell, this is also the first blog post that we release accompanied by an interactive notebook where the reader can, in a spirit of the web-first, participatory science, play with the tech underneath the paper (using the OSS code, publish by original authors).

@vcoisne
Copy link
Contributor Author

vcoisne commented Aug 19, 2019

@bzz sorry about dropping the ball on this. Scheduled for tomorrow

@vcoisne vcoisne closed this as completed Aug 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants