Repository navigation
What should be the "Standard License Header" #68
Replies: 2 comments
|
I like the idea of using SPDX standard line in all files, e.g.: BTW, I'm not seeing the I think it's a good idea to add But I'm not inclined to add a copyright statement to any files, as I would not know who to put in each one. Also, the
|
Sorry my bad, I meant
Is up to you
This might help to extract the original author |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
as observed in #66 afflib.h indicates
Distributed under the Berkeley 4-part licensebut has no explicit copyright statementhttps://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause.html only references the license, but does not define a "Standard License Header"
(for contrast https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-3.0-only.html which does define a "Standard License Header")
This source recommends adding the copyright statement which I would gravitate towards as well.
All reactions