Skip to content

Conversation

Techassi
Copy link
Member

@Techassi Techassi commented Oct 8, 2025

With this PR, container image build pipelines can now select one of the following set of runners:

  • mixed: x86_64 builds run on the GitHub hosted runners and the aarch64 builds run on the Ubicloud runners
  • ubicloud: Both the x86_64 and the aarch64 builds run on the Ubicloud runners

This PR is raised to fix the OpenSearch Dashboards build on x86_64. It is very likely that this feature will be removed or adjusted in the future when the set of available/used runners changes.

@Techassi Techassi self-assigned this Oct 8, 2025
@Techassi Techassi moved this to Development: In Progress in Stackable Engineering Oct 8, 2025
@Techassi Techassi marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2025 09:25
@Techassi Techassi moved this from Development: In Progress to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Oct 8, 2025
NickLarsenNZ
NickLarsenNZ previously approved these changes Oct 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering Oct 8, 2025
@Techassi
Copy link
Member Author

Techassi commented Oct 8, 2025

LGTM, probably also need to update main/.github/actionlint.yaml

Huh, that file would indeed need updating, but we are already using a runner which is not listed in there and it seems like there are no complaints. I assume this is because we use the matrix to set the runs-on field and actionlint might not be smart enough to pick this up.

I can update the file anyway.

This reverts commit de22cd1.

This needs to be reverted, because it doesn't pass CI even though
it passes locally for me. With this reverted, it will fail locally
again. This is very curious, because any differences in file
sorting sue to different shells should be accounted for by the bash
shebang in the script.
Copy link
Member

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Techassi
Copy link
Member Author

Techassi commented Oct 8, 2025

I will merge this at CoB, because this will trigger a rebuild of all images.

@Techassi Techassi added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3567aac Oct 8, 2025
3 checks passed
@Techassi Techassi deleted the ci/runners-selection branch October 8, 2025 15:50
@Techassi Techassi moved this from Development: In Review to Development: Done in Stackable Engineering Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Development: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants