Skip to content

Conversation

amirejaz
Copy link
Contributor

When we do not provide the workload name it is unable to verify whether the workload already exists causing re running the same workload. This change make sure we use the default consistent naming and even if the name is not provided we can check whether the workload is already running.

When we do not provide the workload name it is unable to verify whether
the workload already exists causing re running the same workload. This
change make sure we use the default consistent naming and even if the
name is not provided we can check whether the workload is already running.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.69%. Comparing base (37cb5e4) to head (8286df8).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/runner/protocol.go 25.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1864      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.60%   44.69%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         203      203              
  Lines       25864    25920      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits        11536    11586      +50     
- Misses      13426    13431       +5     
- Partials      902      903       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@amirejaz amirejaz merged commit 736602f into main Sep 15, 2025
17 checks passed
@amirejaz amirejaz deleted the consistent-workload-naming branch September 15, 2025 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants