Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed an issue with actors not being reinstantiated correctly in a microstep #3374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2022

Conversation

Andarist
Copy link
Member

@Andarist Andarist commented Jun 1, 2022

fixes #3353

@Andarist Andarist requested a review from davidkpiano June 1, 2022 11:52
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 1, 2022

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 59c48cb

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
xstate Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jun 1, 2022

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 59c48cb:

Sandbox Source
XState Example Template Configuration
XState React Template Configuration
modest-ganguly-wg4wy4 Issue #3353

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 1, 2022

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review
  • Make big changes easier — review code in small groups of related files

  • Know where to start — see the whole change at a glance

  • Take a code tour — explore the change with an interactive tour

  • Make comments and review — all fully sync’ed with github

    Try it now!

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map Legend

Comment on lines -657 to -662
state.actions.find((otherAction) => {
return (
otherAction.type === actionTypes.stop &&
(otherAction as StopActionObject).params.actor === id
);
})
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the main source of the problem because we had actions looking like this:

actions: [stop('a'), invoke('a')]

Stop action for 'a' was simply found in the array and thus the actor was never reinstantiated - despite of the fact that the invoke was coming after it.

? params.actor(context, _event.data)
: params.actor;
: state.children[params.actor];
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have to resolve a string to the ref here, before we mutate the new children in setChildren that was added here:
https://github.com/statelyai/xstate/pull/3374/files#diff-6f3a03f5c8d5024e53467d74c187685ab0acd0e1efb2549fbf2842d9616ad8dbR1635

Because that setChildren removes stopped children from what is going to become service.state.children we are no longer able to resolve it in the "stop handler" here:
https://github.com/statelyai/xstate/pull/3374/files#diff-fc91146eff717b2bcd6adbc0955ca0549346ad7bef9aa2278e0a75a9793a66b9L683

@@ -305,6 +306,8 @@ export class StateMachine<
preInitial._initial = true;
preInitial.actions.unshift(...actions);

setChildren(preInitial.children, actions);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The preInitial wasn't previously populated with children and thus without this change we were failing the adjusted logic here:
https://github.com/statelyai/xstate/pull/3374/files#diff-fc91146eff717b2bcd6adbc0955ca0549346ad7bef9aa2278e0a75a9793a66b9R656

) {
// If the actor didn't end up being in the state
// (eg. going through transient states could stop it) don't bother starting the actor.
if (!this.state.children[id]) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since state.children are mutated in setChildren "in order" it should be enough to just check if the final result contains the given id or not.

@Andarist Andarist merged commit a990f0e into next Jun 1, 2022
@Andarist Andarist deleted the andarist/fix-3353 branch June 1, 2022 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants