Skip to content

Avoid double work #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2017
Merged

Avoid double work #62

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2017

Conversation

mithrandi
Copy link
Contributor

In the case where the optimized patch is not invalid, we shouldn't need to calculate the patch again.

@mithrandi
Avoid double work
329dcf8 
In the case where the optimized patch is not invalid, we shouldn't need to calculate the patch again.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 6, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.439% when pulling 329dcf8 on mithrandi:patch-1 into 18887df on stefankoegl:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.439% when pulling 329dcf8 on mithrandi:patch-1 into 18887df on stefankoegl:master.

@stefankoegl stefankoegl merged commit e8fbd18 into stefankoegl:master Jul 9, 2017
@stefankoegl
Copy link
Owner

@mithrandi, thanks for your contribution!

@mithrandi mithrandi deleted the patch-1 branch July 9, 2017 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mithrandi @coveralls @stefankoegl