bug 2123: do not try to (confusingly) "repair" missing buckets, just fail #2232
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in #2123, the "repair" code is too clever for its own good: it's a sort of wishful-thinking about content addressed buckets that fails to recognize that it has at best a one-in-64 chance of working, and would only ever work when a bucket went missing after being published (and before being replaced with some other local one).
In practice this never happened: the only cases of bucket corruption or missing buckets we've seen in the field were fsync failures and people misconfiguring their BUCKET_DIR, and the "repair" work that kicks in is lost in the error logs, causing the user to totally misinterpret their stalled server as a broken history archive (because the work "can't find" the buckets it's looking for in the archive, and emits an error about that failure-to-download).
This PR just removes the attempt at repair. It is never going to work anyways, and it's better to just be honest and tell the user that with a clear exception. A corrupt bucket dir is actually corrupt and the best repair approach is to kill the node and fast-catch-up to a state before the failure, then let it replay forwards.