Skip to content

Conversation

akeem
Copy link
Contributor

@akeem akeem commented May 19, 2013

Breaking up the existing #call so that its a bit easier to
track the flow. This refactor introduces four private methods
to accomplish this.

  • JSON::MergePatch#process_patch_property
  • JSON::MergePatch#evaluate_patch_property
  • JSON::MergePatch#remove_property
  • JSON::MergePatch#update_property

Breaking up the existing #call so that its a bit easier to
track the flow. This refactor introduces four private methods
to accomplish this.

* JSON::MergePatch#process_patch_property
* JSON::MergePatch#evaluate_patch_property
* JSON::MergePatch#remove_property
* JSON::MergePatch#update_property
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling d84f6ce on akeem:merge_patch_call_refactor into 20e65a6 on steveklabnik:master.

steveklabnik added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2013
Slight refactoring of JSON::MergePatch#call
@steveklabnik steveklabnik merged commit ae99592 into steveklabnik:master May 19, 2013
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Owner

Thank you, this is great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants