Skip to content

Re-evaluate interrupt priority values #503

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2019
Merged

Re-evaluate interrupt priority values #503

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2019

Conversation

fpistm
Copy link
Member

@fpistm fpistm commented Apr 19, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Can be redefined thanks variant.h or build_opt.h

Fix #472

IRQ Old New
Systick 0 0
U(S)ART 0 1
USB 5 1
I2C 0 2
EXTI 6 3/6
TIM 14 3/14
RTC 2 2

With x/y = x for Cortex-M0 else y

@fpistm
Re-evaluate interrupt priority values
f81b390 
Can be redefined thanks variant.h or build_opt.h
Fix stm32duino#472

Signed-off-by: Frederic.Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
@fpistm fpistm added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 19, 2019
@fpistm fpistm added this to the 1.6.0 milestone Apr 19, 2019
@fpistm fpistm self-assigned this Apr 19, 2019
@fpistm fpistm added the fix 🩹 Bug fix label Apr 19, 2019
@fpistm
Copy link
Member Author

fpistm commented Apr 19, 2019

@benwaffle ,
let me know your feedback 😉
thanks in advance

@benwaffle
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, this works for my use case

@fpistm fpistm merged commit 64fbe82 into stm32duino:master Apr 21, 2019
@fpistm fpistm deleted the IRQ_prio branch April 21, 2019 06:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@fpistm fpistm

Labels
enhancement New feature or request fix 🩹 Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.6.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Re-evaluate interrupt priority values
2 participants
@fpistm @benwaffle