Skip to content

Conversation

grdsdev
Copy link
Contributor

@grdsdev grdsdev commented Sep 2, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...

What is the current behavior?

When one needs to provide a custom instance of KeychainLocalStorage just to pass in an access group, one most pass in also the service value, usually you don't care about service value and wants to just use the default one.

What is the new behavior?

Add a default value to the service param, so one can pass just an access group and keep the default service value.

Additional context

#516 (comment)

@grdsdev grdsdev requested a review from dshukertjr September 2, 2024 11:38
@grdsdev grdsdev marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2024 11:38
@grdsdev grdsdev merged commit c1095c9 into main Sep 2, 2024
8 checks passed
@grdsdev grdsdev deleted the fix/auth-local-storage branch September 2, 2024 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants