feat: add OSLogSupabaseLogger type

[grdsdev]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improvement

What is the current behavior?

User needs to manually implement a SupabaseLogger which uses a OSLog.

What is the new behavior?

We now provide a SupabaseLogger implementation that uses OSLog, since this is probably the most used logger across Apple projects.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16607682663

Details

• 0 of 18 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 78.056%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
Sources/Helpers/Logger/OSLogSupabaseLogger.swift	0	18	0.0%

Totals
Change from base Build 16605636117:	-0.2%
Covered Lines:	5485
Relevant Lines:	7027

---

💛 - Coveralls

[supabase-releaser]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.31.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[arbyruns]

Just learning about this. Is there an advantage of using this over implementing logger yourself?

[grdsdev]

@arbyruns this is only a convenience logger implementation, if you use OSLog as the logger backend, then it makes sense to use this instead of reimplementing your own.

If you use a different logging backend, then you implement your own.