Skip to content

Conversation

paul-english
Copy link
Contributor

@paul-english paul-english commented Feb 15, 2017

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guildelines.
  • Ran the shell/batch script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh and ./bin/security/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates)
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: master for non-breaking changes and 2.3.0 branch for breaking (non-backward compatible) changes.

Description of the PR

Add an escape method for handling UUIDs in generated scala client code.

@paul-english
Copy link
Contributor Author

This fixes #4806

@wing328
Copy link
Contributor

wing328 commented Feb 16, 2017

@log0ymxm thanks for the PR, which has been merged into master.

FYI. After the 2.2.2 release, we plan to merge "async-scala" into the "scala" client (which means one single "scala" API client to support both async and sync HTTP calls)

(If your company is using Swagger Codegen, please consider adding your company name to this list)

@wing328 wing328 merged commit accd176 into swagger-api:master Feb 16, 2017
@wing328
Copy link
Contributor

wing328 commented Feb 16, 2017

Btw, for your upcoming PRs, I would recommend creating a new branch for the change as per git best practice.

@paul-english
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, my mistake. I noticed that guideline after already submitting the PR. I'll do that in the future. Thanks for accepting the PR.

@wing328
Copy link
Contributor

wing328 commented Feb 16, 2017

@log0ymxm np. Your PR (with updated petstore sample) is good 👍

@wing328 wing328 changed the title Ensure that ApiInvoker.scala can support UUID types [Scala] Ensure that ApiInvoker.scala can support UUID types Feb 20, 2017
davidgri pushed a commit to davidgri/swagger-codegen that referenced this pull request May 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants