Skip to content

Conversation

grynspan
Copy link
Contributor

@grynspan grynspan commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR moves our main branch's swift-syntax dependency from 600.0.0 to 601.

Checklist:

  • Code and documentation should follow the style of the Style Guide.
  • If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should be updated.

This PR moves our main branch's swift-syntax dependency from 600.0.0 to 601.
@grynspan grynspan added bug 🪲 Something isn't working build 🧱 Affects the project's build configuration or process labels Dec 10, 2024
@grynspan grynspan added this to the Swift 6.1 milestone Dec 10, 2024
@grynspan grynspan self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
@grynspan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

@grynspan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

@grynspan grynspan merged commit 8a78407 into main Dec 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@grynspan grynspan deleted the jgrynspan/adopt-swift-syntax-601 branch December 10, 2024 19:35
@grynspan grynspan modified the milestones: Swift 6.1, Swift 6.x Dec 10, 2024
grynspan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
This PR moves our main branch's swift-syntax dependency from 600.0.0 to
601.

### Checklist:

- [x] Code and documentation should follow the style of the [Style
Guide](https://github.com/apple/swift-testing/blob/main/Documentation/StyleGuide.md).
- [x] If public symbols are renamed or modified, DocC references should
be updated.
grynspan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
- **Explanation**: Update our swift-syntax package dependency.
  - **Scope**: 6.1 release when building as a package
  - **Issues**: N/A
  - **Original PRs**: #847
  - **Risk**: Low (no obvious issues)
- **Testing**: All tests continue to pass. No additional testing needed.
  - **Reviewers**: @briancroom @stmontgomery
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🪲 Something isn't working build 🧱 Affects the project's build configuration or process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants