Skip to content

Conversation

nate-chandler
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, an OpaqueUnderlyingType constraint was created only if the contextual type purpose was CTP_ReturnStmt. Now that there is a distinct CTP for implicit, single-expression returns, an OpaqueUnderlyingType constraint needs to be created if that is the CTP.

Previously, an OpaqueUnderlyingType constraint was created only if the
contextual type purpose was CTP_ReturnStmt.  Now that there is a
distinct CTP for implicit, single-expression returns, an
OpaqueUnderlyingType constraint needs to be created if that is the CTP.
@nate-chandler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@nate-chandler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@nate-chandler nate-chandler merged commit 6352764 into swiftlang:master Apr 26, 2019
@nate-chandler nate-chandler deleted the nate/49581931-opaque-implicit-return-constraint branch July 5, 2023 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant