Skip to content

Fix the LLVM repo path in lldbToolBox.py #30749

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2020
Merged

Fix the LLVM repo path in lldbToolBox.py #30749

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2020

Conversation

MForster
Copy link
Contributor

@MForster MForster commented Apr 1, 2020

I guess this got broken in the monorepo migration.

I guess this got broken in the monorepo migration.
@MForster
Copy link
Contributor Author

MForster commented Apr 1, 2020

@gottesmm, I think this would be something that you could review?

@compnerd
Copy link
Member

compnerd commented Apr 1, 2020

CC: @JDevlieghere @dcci

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't used lldbToolBox.py but the change looks good with the new layout.

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Apr 1, 2020

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 35b06b6

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci please test linux platform

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Apr 1, 2020

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 35b06b6

@gribozavr
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux

@MForster
Copy link
Contributor Author

MForster commented Apr 6, 2020

Ok, so the smoke tests succeeded. I can't find logs for the previous failed "Swift Test Linux Platform" tests.

Merge?

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere merged commit dc57ddc into swiftlang:master Apr 6, 2020
@MForster MForster deleted the fix-lldb-toolbox branch April 20, 2020 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants