Teach the VarDeclUsageChecker About Variables Bound in Patterns #33033
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The VDUC was missing a class of AST nodes that can bind variables: patterns in switch statements. For these, it was falling back to requesting a simple replacement of the bound variable name with _. But for patterns, this means there's a two-step dance the user has to go through where the first fixit does this: .pattern(let x) -> .pattern(let _) Then a second round of compilation would emit a fixit to do this: .pattern(let _) -> .pattern(_) Instead, detect "simple" variable bindings - for now, variable patterns that are immediately preceded by a `let` or `var` binding pattern - and collapse two steps into one. Resolves rdar://47240768
|
@swift-ci smoke test and merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The VDUC was missing a class of AST nodes that can bind variables:
patterns (in switch statements). For these, it was falling back to
requesting a simple replacement of the bound variable name with _. But
for patterns, this means there's a two-step dance the user has to go
through where the first fixit does this:
Then a second round of compilation would emit a fixit to do this:
Instead, detect "simple" variable bindings - for now, variable patterns
that are immediately preceded by a
letorvarbinding pattern - andcollapse two steps into one.
Resolves rdar://47240768