Add arch info to benchmark report

[shahmishal]

No description provided.

[shahmishal]

@swift-ci Apple Silicon benchmark

[shahmishal]

@swift-ci smoke test

[swift-ci]

Performance (arm64): -O

Regression	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
DictionaryOfAnyHashableStrings_insert	1288	2338	+81.5%	0.55x
Set.isDisjoint.Box25	117	199	+70.1%	0.59x (?)
Set.isDisjoint.Int50	89	131	+47.2%	0.68x (?)
DictionaryKeysContainsNative	12	15	+25.0%	0.80x (?)
DictionaryBridgeToObjC_Bridge	4	5	+25.0%	0.80x (?)
StringRemoveDupes	123	147	+19.5%	0.84x (?)
DictionarySubscriptDefaultMutationOfObjects	420	480	+14.3%	0.88x (?)
DictionaryGroup	115	131	+13.9%	0.88x (?)
Set.isStrictSubset.Box25	87	98	+12.6%	0.89x (?)
SetIsSubsetBox25	87	98	+12.6%	0.89x (?)
DictionarySwap	528	592	+12.1%	0.89x (?)
Histogram	252	280	+11.1%	0.90x (?)
DictionaryRemoveOfObjects	6000	6600	+10.0%	0.91x (?)
SetSubtractingInt50	57	62	+8.8%	0.92x (?)
DictionaryRemove	1840	2000	+8.7%	0.92x (?)
Set.isSuperset.Seq.Int50	83	90	+8.4%	0.92x (?)
Set.subtracting.Seq.Box0	488	529	+8.4%	0.92x (?)
SetSubtractingInt0	37	40	+8.1%	0.93x (?)
Set.isStrictSubset.Int50	87	94	+8.0%	0.93x (?)
DictionarySwapAt	424	456	+7.5%	0.93x (?)
Improvement	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
Set.filter.Int100.24k	877	811	-7.5%	1.08x
Dict.CopyKeyValue.24k	889	823	-7.4%	1.08x
Set.filter.Int100.20k	752	699	-7.0%	1.08x

Code size: -O

Performance (arm64): -Osize

Regression	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
StringEnumRawValueInitialization	260	280	+7.7%	0.93x
Improvement	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
CharacterPropertiesStashed	670	610	-9.0%	1.10x (?)

Code size: -Osize

Performance (arm64): -Onone

Improvement	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
ArrayAppendOptionals	440	400	-9.1%	1.10x (?)

Code size: -swiftlibs

How to read the data

The tables contain differences in performance which are larger than 8% and differences in code size which are larger than 1%.

If you see any unexpected regressions, you should consider fixing the
regressions before you merge the PR.

Noise: Sometimes the performance results (not code size!) contain false
alarms. Unexpected regressions which are marked with '(?)' are probably noise.
If you see regressions which you cannot explain you can try to run the
benchmarks again. If regressions still show up, please consult with the
performance team (@eeckstein).

Hardware Overview

  Model Name: Mac mini
  Model Identifier: Macmini9,1
  Total Number of Cores: 8 (4 performance and 4 efficiency)
  Memory: 16 GB

[shahmishal]

@swift-ci smoke test macOS

[swift-ci]

Performance (arm64): -O

Regression	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
DictionaryOfAnyHashableStrings_insert	1288	2282	+77.2%	0.56x
Set.isDisjoint.Box25	117	199	+70.1%	0.59x (?)
Set.isDisjoint.Int25	89	135	+51.7%	0.66x (?)
Set.isDisjoint.Int50	89	131	+47.2%	0.68x (?)
DictionaryKeysContainsNative	11	13	+18.2%	0.85x (?)
SetIsSubsetBox25	86	98	+14.0%	0.88x (?)
Set.isStrictSubset.Box25	87	98	+12.6%	0.89x (?)
DictionarySwap	528	592	+12.1%	0.89x (?)
DictionaryGroup	117	131	+12.0%	0.89x (?)
DictionarySubscriptDefaultMutation	136	152	+11.8%	0.89x (?)
DictionarySubscriptDefaultMutationOfObjects	440	480	+9.1%	0.92x (?)
CharacterPropertiesStashed	570	620	+8.8%	0.92x (?)
DictionaryRemoveOfObjects	6100	6600	+8.2%	0.92x (?)
DictionarySwapAt	424	456	+7.5%	0.93x (?)
Improvement	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
SortArrayInClass	69787	59949	-14.1%	1.16x (?)
StringToDataLargeUnicode	1300	1150	-11.5%	1.13x (?)
Set.filter.Int100.24k	876	809	-7.6%	1.08x
Dict.CopyKeyValue.24k	888	823	-7.3%	1.08x (?)
ObjectiveCBridgeFromNSDictionaryAnyObjectToString	36000	33500	-6.9%	1.07x (?)

Code size: -O

Performance (arm64): -Osize

Improvement	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
DataAppendDataLargeToLarge	14200	11000	-22.5%	1.29x (?)

Code size: -Osize

Performance (arm64): -Onone

Regression	OLD	NEW	DELTA	RATIO
DropLastAnyCollectionLazy	19747	21357	+8.2%	0.92x (?)

Code size: -swiftlibs

How to read the data

The tables contain differences in performance which are larger than 8% and differences in code size which are larger than 1%.

If you see any unexpected regressions, you should consider fixing the
regressions before you merge the PR.

Noise: Sometimes the performance results (not code size!) contain false
alarms. Unexpected regressions which are marked with '(?)' are probably noise.
If you see regressions which you cannot explain you can try to run the
benchmarks again. If regressions still show up, please consult with the
performance team (@eeckstein).

Hardware Overview

  Model Name: Mac mini
  Model Identifier: Macmini9,1
  Total Number of Cores: 8 (4 performance and 4 efficiency)
  Memory: 16 GB