[SILOpt] Fix layout based pre-specialization with marker protocols #71038
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Marker protocols can be ignored in the specialization, because they have no witness and the conformance will be checked before the specialization is applied. Also fixes an issue where multiple requirements on the same type caused type mismatches in the erased signature.
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
carlos4242
pushed a commit
to carlos4242/swift
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…wiftlang#71038) Marker protocols can be ignored in the specialization, because they have no witness and the conformance will be checked before the specialization is applied. Also fixes an issue where multiple requirements on the same type caused type mismatches in the erased signature.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Marker protocols can be ignored in the specialization, because they have no witness and the conformance will be checked before the specialization is applied.
Also fixes an issue where multiple requirements on the same type caused type mismatches in the erased signature.