[DebugInfo] Fix infinite recursion when opaque return type is defined inside function returning it #81794
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
augusto2112
changed the title
jamieQ
reviewed
May 28, 2025
adrian-prantl
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
inside function returning it A stack overflow would happen when the compiler tried emitting debug info for a function whose opaque return type was declared inside the function itself. This fixes the issue by emitting a forward declaration for the function before emitting it. rdar://150313956
augusto2112
force-pushed
the
fix-opaque-infinite-rec
branch
from
d09ef33 to
c03831f
Compare
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A stack overflow would happen when the compiler tried emitting debug info for a function whose opaque return type was declared inside the function itself. This fixes the issue by emitting a forward declaration for the function before emitting it.
rdar://150313956