[Embedded] Introduce a test for @_implementationOnly + @_neverEmitIntoClient #83820
+88
−0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Desktop Swift, @_implementationOnly imports allow one to hide the implementation so long as you're careful to only reference entities from the imported modules in code that gets compiled into the object file and not referenced by the corresponding Swift module file.
Until very recently, there was no such affordance for Embedded Swift, because all functions would have their SIL serialized to the Swift module file. Using them from a client module would then attempt to deserialize the SIL, loading the @_implementationOnly-imported module and causing the compiler to abort. With the introduction of @_neverEmitIntoClient, we now have a way to say "only in the object file, never in the module file" for the definition of functions.
Introduce a test that makes sure @_implementationOnly + @_neverEmitIntoClient has the desired effect of hiding the imported modules from clients. It's still brittle and hard to use, just like the existing @_implementationOnly, but this shows that it's at least possible to do this implementation hiding in Embedded Swift.