-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[Dependency Scanning] Configure a serialized diagnostics consumer for in-memory scans #84191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
artemcm
merged 3 commits into
swiftlang:main
from
artemcm:InMemoryDepScanSerializedDiagnostics
Sep 15, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you need to type-erase to the base type. This can just be
ThreadSafeSerializedDiagnosticConsumer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only did so because the existing
SerializedDiagnosticConsumer
infrastructure, and therefore also my extension, are both defined inSerializedDiagnosticConsumer.cpp
implementation file. We could hoist them up to be in a header, but I wanted to match the existing pattern.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like ThreadSafeDiagnosticConsumer can be together with DiagnosticConsumer and we can just use this type here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this comment, could you please be more specific?
ThreadSafeSerializedDiagnosticConsumer
inherits fromSerializedDiagnosticConsumer
. The latter is implementation-only (defined in a.cpp
). I modeled the former to match. What does "can be together with DiagnosticConsumer " mean?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean
ThreadSafeDiagnosticConsumer
that inherits fromDiagnosticConsumer
. We only need to make sure it is aThreadSafeDiagnosticConsumer
so we can add to scan instance. I don't see any upcast is needed to add here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you referring to
ThreadSafeDiagnosticCollector
? Are you suggesting thatThreadSafeSerializedDiagnosticConsumer
inherit bothThreadSafeDiagnosticCollector
andSerializedDiagnosticConsumer
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, ok, I don't want to have a diamond here. Maybe I will model it as
ThreadSafeDiagnosticConsumer
with an internal SerializedDiagnosticConsumer, but you can't finish processing like that.I will let you decide if you want to do it this way. Otherwise LGTM.