Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev 3.x rpc listassets #211

Merged
merged 78 commits into from
Jun 1, 2018
Merged

Dev 3.x rpc listassets #211

merged 78 commits into from
Jun 1, 2018

Conversation

sidhujag
Copy link
Member

@sidhujag sidhujag commented Jun 1, 2018

  1. listassetallocationtransactions RPC (must enable -assetallocationindex in conf file)
  2. Optimization: don't write out to zmq or allocation the json strings/obj's if zmq topic is not registered in the conf file

@sidhujag sidhujag merged commit 3c4b6a8 into dev-3.x-prep-3.0.5 Jun 1, 2018
@sidhujag sidhujag mentioned this pull request Jun 14, 2018
@sidhujag sidhujag deleted the dev-3.x-rpc-listassets branch September 24, 2018 16:32
sidhujag pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2021
…abel" action

5440c07 qt: Rename "Edit label" to "Edit address label" (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
22664d6 Revert "qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action" (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  This reverts PR #211.

  I disagree with this change, I use the functionality a lot, it was the primary way I used to organize and edit transactions labels and am sad to see this go.

  > you can edit a sending address in the send tab Address Book

  Using the address book should not be encouraged at all! A while ago it was even proposed to remove it. There's rarely need to scroll through all historical addresses used and unused. The transaction list does just fine for this.

  > While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the Edit Label action applies to the selected transaction's address.

  **In practice** when bitcoin is used in the commonly advised way, generate a new address for each transaction, those are equivalent though.

  I doubt I (and **luke-jr**) will be the only users that will stumblle on this. Further discussion here: bitcoin-core/gui#211 (comment)

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 5440c07, verified that 22664d6 is a clean revert of 8f96448.

Tree-SHA512: 3a86a730279bc454d0bd25d874dbfb6b1c0492480e66c3164e7c60d8658d622d4522de11bf8564876dc3ee056b53db71ecbe8a37281bf25d41a27e6e0d72ad8f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant