Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.3.1 not handling pseudo-elements properly #10960

Closed
codepic opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

3.3.1 not handling pseudo-elements properly #10960

codepic opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@codepic
Copy link

codepic commented Apr 6, 2023

What version of Tailwind CSS are you using?

3.3.1

What build tool (or framework if it abstracts the build tool) are you using?

tailwindcss

What version of Node.js are you using?

v18.14.0

Steps to Repro

mkdir repro
cd repro
yarn global add tailwindcss@3.3.1
tailwindcss init

Create repro.css with the following content:

@config 'tailwind.config.js';
::deep [a] {
    @apply bg-white;
}

Run tailwindcss --input .\repro.css --output .\result.css

/* result.css / Incorrect */
[a]::deep {
  --tw-bg-opacity: 1;
  background-color: rgb(255 255 255 / var(--tw-bg-opacity))
}

You can fix this by downgrading tailwindcss to 3.3.0:

yarn global add tailwindcss@3.3.0
tailwindcss --input .\repro.css --output .\result.css

And the CORRECT output

/* Correct! */
::deep [a] {
  --tw-bg-opacity: 1;
  background-color: rgb(255 255 255 / var(--tw-bg-opacity))
}
@thecrypticace
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! We encountered a similar problem with ::ng-deep in Angular — while we had a bit of a patch fix for that we ended up rewriting our selector handling to handle unknown pseudo-elements better in #10962.

This will be in the next release — and in our insiders build if you want to test it before we tag a new one: npm install tailwindcss@insiders.

Thanks for reporting this! ✨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants