Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prioritize user instances when coping from prior frame #1658

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vaibhavtrip29
Copy link
Contributor

@vaibhavtrip29 vaibhavtrip29 commented Jan 12, 2024

Description

Prioritised copy prior frame to take user instance when available.

Types of changes

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Refactor / Code style update (no logical changes)
  • Build / CI changes
  • Documentation Update
  • Other (explain)

Does this address any currently open issues?

[list open issues here]
#1065

Outside contributors checklist

  • Review the guidelines for contributing to this repository
  • Read and sign the CLA and add yourself to the authors list
  • Make sure you are making a pull request against the develop branch (not main). Also you should start your branch off develop
  • Add tests that prove your fix is effective or that your feature works
  • Add necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Thank you for contributing to SLEAP!

❤️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved instance addition by prioritizing user instances over predicted ones when copying from previous frames.
  • Tests

    • Added tests to ensure the new instance prioritization logic works correctly.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update to the GUI application extended the logic for setting the copy instance to consider the type of instance and prioritize user instances over predicted instances. It introduced new static methods in commands.py to handle the replacement of instances with user instances if needed, and in test_commands.py, it added new test functions and made modifications to existing ones to validate the enhanced functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
sleap/gui/commands.py Extended logic for setting copy instance, added new static methods.
tests/gui/test_commands.py Added new test functions, modified existing ones.

Poem

🐇 "In the realm of frames and points,
A clever hop to join the joints.
User's touch now leads the dance,
CodeRabbit hails the enhanced stance." 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (60a441f) 73.38% compared to head (8013b77) 73.41%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 8013b77 differs from pull request most recent head 61be664. Consider uploading reports for the commit 61be664 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
sleap/gui/commands.py 95.23% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1658      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    73.38%   73.41%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          134      134              
  Lines        24064    24083      +19     
===========================================
+ Hits         17659    17681      +22     
+ Misses        6405     6402       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@roomrys
Copy link
Collaborator

roomrys commented Jan 12, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14b5b78 and 5ac817b.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • sleap/gui/commands.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/gui/test_commands.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
tests/gui/test_commands.py (4)
  • 21-21: The addition of the Point class to the import statements is noted. Ensure that this class is used in the new test functions as expected.

  • 619-662: The new test function test_CopyPriorFramePreviousUser correctly sets up a command context and asserts the behavior of copying a user instance from a previous frame. The assertions check that the new instance matches the user instance from the previous frame in terms of video, points, and track.

  • 664-707: The test function test_CopyPriorFramePreviousUser2 is designed to verify the copying of a user instance in a scenario where the current frame has no instances. The assertions confirm that the user instance in the current frame matches the user instance from the previous frame.

  • 710-759: The test function test_CopyPriorFrameCurrentUser checks the copying of a user instance in the current frame when the current frame has an equal or greater number of instances than the previous frame. The assertions ensure that the newly added instance matches the existing user instance in the current frame.

sleap/gui/commands.py (1)
  • 3022-3038: The new static method find_last_user_instance has been added to the AddInstance class. This method is used to find the last user instance in a given frame, which is a part of the logic for copying instances. The implementation looks correct and uses the user_instances property of the LabeledFrame to get the last user instance if available.

Comment on lines 3087 to 3128
prev_frame = context.labels.find(
context.state["video"], prev_idx, return_new=True
)[0].instances
)[0]
prev_instances = prev_frame.instances
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]

if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

from_prev_frame = True
elif init_method == "best" and (
context.state["labeled_frame"].instances
):
# Otherwise, if there are already instances in current frame,
# copy the points from the last instance added to frame.
copy_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].instances[-1]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in current frame
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(
context.state["labeled_frame"]
)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

elif len(prev_instances):
# Otherwise use the last instance added to previous frame.
copy_instance = prev_instances[-1]

if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jan 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method find_instance_to_copy_from has been updated to include calls to find_last_user_instance. This change ensures that when copying instances from a prior frame, the last user instance is prioritized over predicted instances. The logic appears to be correct, and the use of isinstance checks ensures that the method is robust to different instance types. However, there is a repeated pattern that could be refactored to reduce code duplication.

- if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
-     # Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
-     user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
-     if user_instance is not None:
-         copy_instance = user_instance
+ # Refactor repeated logic into a method
+ copy_instance = self._replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(copy_instance, prev_frame)

Committable suggestion

IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
prev_frame = context.labels.find(
context.state["video"], prev_idx, return_new=True
)[0].instances
)[0]
prev_instances = prev_frame.instances
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance
from_prev_frame = True
elif init_method == "best" and (
context.state["labeled_frame"].instances
):
# Otherwise, if there are already instances in current frame,
# copy the points from the last instance added to frame.
copy_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].instances[-1]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in current frame
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(
context.state["labeled_frame"]
)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance
elif len(prev_instances):
# Otherwise use the last instance added to previous frame.
copy_instance = prev_instances[-1]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance
prev_frame = context.labels.find(
context.state["video"], prev_idx, return_new=True
)[0]
prev_instances = prev_frame.instances
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]
copy_instance = self._replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(copy_instance, prev_frame)
from_prev_frame = True
elif init_method == "best" and (
context.state["labeled_frame"].instances
):
# Otherwise, if there are already instances in current frame,
# copy the points from the last instance added to frame.
copy_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].instances[-1]
copy_instance = self._replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(copy_instance, context.state["labeled_frame"])
elif len(prev_instances):
# Otherwise use the last instance added to previous frame.
copy_instance = prev_instances[-1]
copy_instance = self._replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(copy_instance, prev_frame)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, the same pattern is used over an over, maybe we can just include that into the new method you created.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roomrys Absolutely, the repeated logic can be encapsulated within the find_last_user_instance method to streamline the code. This will ensure that the method not only finds the last user instance but also replaces the predicted instance with the user instance when appropriate. I'll adjust the method accordingly.

@roomrys roomrys self-requested a review January 12, 2024 21:00
@roomrys roomrys marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2024 21:00
@roomrys roomrys changed the title Added solution for copy prior frame issue in all 3 cases Prioritize user instances when coping from prior frame Jan 12, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@roomrys roomrys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very thorough tests and good code re-use. The only thing that really needs attention is the first case where

len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)

I don't think that the logic of just taking the last user instance is what was intended here. See the suggestion for this section of code. Everything else is more of a suggestion. Good work 👍🏼

Comment on lines 3091 to 3104
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]

if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

from_prev_frame = True
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of the three ways am instance is copied from the previous frame, this is the only one that doesn't seem to match the intended functionality. This case tries to find an instance that exists in the previous frame, but not in the current frame and add it to the current frame. We can use that same logic, but just prioritize the user instance. Maybe something like:

Suggested change
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance
from_prev_frame = True
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
prev_user_instances = prev_instances.user_instances
current_user_instances = context.state["labeled_frame"].instances
if len(prev_instances.user_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].user_instances):
user_instance = prev_user_instances[len(current_user_instances)]
else:
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]
from_prev_frame = True

I liked that you added an AddInstance.find_last_user method, maybe we can edit that function a bit to find_user_instance(index: int = -1, frame: LabeledFrame) where we use a default argument for the index to always get the last instance if the index is not provided?

Comment on lines 3087 to 3128
prev_frame = context.labels.find(
context.state["video"], prev_idx, return_new=True
)[0].instances
)[0]
prev_instances = prev_frame.instances
if len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):
# If more instances in previous frame than current, then use the
# first unmatched instance.
copy_instance = prev_instances[
len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)
]

if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

from_prev_frame = True
elif init_method == "best" and (
context.state["labeled_frame"].instances
):
# Otherwise, if there are already instances in current frame,
# copy the points from the last instance added to frame.
copy_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].instances[-1]
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in current frame
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(
context.state["labeled_frame"]
)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

elif len(prev_instances):
# Otherwise use the last instance added to previous frame.
copy_instance = prev_instances[-1]

if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in previous frame, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(prev_frame)
if user_instance is not None:
copy_instance = user_instance

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, the same pattern is used over an over, maybe we can just include that into the new method you created.

Comment on lines 650 to 658
prev_instances.append(user_inst)

# Confirm there is one user instance in previous frame
assert len(prev_frame.user_instances) == 1

context.newInstance(init_method="prior_frame")

# Confirm that the newly added user instance is the same as the sole user instance in the previous frame+
newly_added_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].user_instances[0]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a better check would be to insert the user_inst (instead of append) since the original logic that we wanted to change would have just taken the last instance in the prev_instances list in any case. I would also add assertion statements here to ensure that we are in the case that you want to test (and to help me, the reviewer), i.e. for the first case:

assert len(prev_instances) > len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances):

assert newly_added_instance.track == user_inst.track


def test_CopyPriorFramePreviousUser2(centered_pair_predictions: Labels):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use a better name that describes what the 2 means, or you could bundle it into the previous test if you want and section with assert statements, i.e. for the second case we would make some changes to our labels to enter the second case and:

assert len(prev_instances) <= len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)  # not the first case
assert context.state["labeled_frame"].instances  # but yes to the second case

Comment on lines 696 to 704
prev_instances.insert(0, user_inst)

# Confirm addition of user instance in previous frame
assert len(prev_frame.user_instances) == 1

context.newInstance(init_method="best")

# Confirm that user instance in current frame is the same as the user instance in previous frame
current_user_instance = context.state["labeled_frame"].user_instances[0]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! yes the insert! The only comment here would be to add the assert statement for which case we are in:

assert len(prev_instances) <= len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances)  # no to the first case
assert context.state["labeled_frame"].instances  # but yes to the second case

Comment on lines 711 to 712
"""Test that we copy user instance in current frame when the current frame has >= amount of instances
as the previous frame."""
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: this is a bit too long of a summary doc string (see google style guide), but I am super pleased that you added some docstrings in the first place!

Comment on lines +744 to +745
# Confirm that current frame has more instances than previous frame
assert len(context.state["labeled_frame"].instances) > len(prev_frame.instances)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ac817b and 2bdffea.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • sleap/gui/commands.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/gui/test_commands.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
tests/gui/test_commands.py (2)
  • 21-21: The import of the Point class from sleap.instance is correctly added to support the new test cases that involve creating instances with points.
  • 619-782: The new test functions test_CopyPriorFrame_MoreInstancesInPreviousFrame, test_CopyPriorFrame_EquivalentInstancesInCurrentAndPreviousFrame, and test_CopyPriorFrame_GetFromCurrentFrame are well-structured and directly address the PR objectives by testing the prioritization of user instances over predicted instances in various scenarios. Each test function correctly sets up the context and labeled frames to simulate the conditions described in their docstrings, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the new logic introduced in the PR.
  • The tests effectively manipulate the CommandContext and labeled frames to create scenarios with different numbers of user and predicted instances across frames.
  • The use of assertions to verify the conditions before and after the operation (e.g., the number of user instances and their properties) is appropriate and ensures the correctness of the new functionality.
  • The clear and descriptive docstrings provide valuable context for understanding the purpose and expected behavior of each test, aligning with best practices for test documentation.

Overall, these tests are well-implemented and effectively validate the new functionality introduced in the PR.

sleap/gui/commands.py (2)
  • 3098-3141: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3022-3138]

The integration of find_last_user_instance and replace_with_user_instance_if_needed within find_instance_to_copy_from method correctly implements the logic to prioritize user instances. However, there's a potential issue with the handling of from_predicted and from_prev_frame flags, which could lead to incorrect assumptions about the source of the copied instance. Ensure these flags are accurately set based on the actual source of the instance being copied.

Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of find_instance_to_copy_from when dealing with different scenarios of user and predicted instances in previous frames.

  • 3098-3141: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3022-3138]

Overall, the changes made in the sleap/gui/commands.py file align with the PR objectives to prioritize user instances when copying from a prior frame. The addition of new methods and modifications to existing logic are well-thought-out. However, ensure thorough testing, especially around edge cases where the previous frame might not contain any user instances or when multiple instances (user and predicted) are present.

While the changes are approved, consider the suggestions made for improving documentation and handling edge cases.

Comment on lines 3022 to 3051
@staticmethod
def find_last_user_instance(
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
index: int = -1,
) -> Optional[Instance]:
"""Find last user instance to copy from

Args:
frame_to_copy_from: The last labeled frame from which we obtain the last user instance.

Returns:
The last user instance in the previous frame (if present), otherwise null
"""

user_instances = frame_to_copy_from.user_instances
if len(user_instances) > 0:
return user_instances[index]

@staticmethod
def replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(
copy_instance: Optional[Union[Instance, PredictedInstance]],
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
):
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in frame to copy from, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(frame_to_copy_from)
if user_instance is not None:
return user_instance

return copy_instance
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method find_last_user_instance correctly retrieves the last user instance from a given frame, which aligns with the PR's objective to prioritize user instances. However, consider handling the case where index might be out of bounds for user_instances.

if len(user_instances) > 0 and abs(index) <= len(user_instances):
    return user_instances[index]

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
@staticmethod
def find_last_user_instance(
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
index: int = -1,
) -> Optional[Instance]:
"""Find last user instance to copy from
Args:
frame_to_copy_from: The last labeled frame from which we obtain the last user instance.
Returns:
The last user instance in the previous frame (if present), otherwise null
"""
user_instances = frame_to_copy_from.user_instances
if len(user_instances) > 0:
return user_instances[index]
@staticmethod
def replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(
copy_instance: Optional[Union[Instance, PredictedInstance]],
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
):
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in frame to copy from, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(frame_to_copy_from)
if user_instance is not None:
return user_instance
return copy_instance
if len(user_instances) > 0 and abs(index) <= len(user_instances):
return user_instances[index]

Comment on lines 3041 to 3051
def replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(
copy_instance: Optional[Union[Instance, PredictedInstance]],
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
):
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in frame to copy from, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(frame_to_copy_from)
if user_instance is not None:
return user_instance

return copy_instance
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method replace_with_user_instance_if_needed effectively replaces a predicted instance with a user instance if available. This method supports the PR's goal but lacks documentation on its parameters and return type, which could improve code readability and maintainability.

+    """
+    Replaces a predicted instance with a user instance if available.
+
+    Args:
+        copy_instance: The instance to potentially replace.
+        frame_to_copy_from: The frame from which to find a user instance.
+
+    Returns:
+        The user instance if found; otherwise, returns the original instance.
+    """

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
def replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(
copy_instance: Optional[Union[Instance, PredictedInstance]],
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
):
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in frame to copy from, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(frame_to_copy_from)
if user_instance is not None:
return user_instance
return copy_instance
def replace_with_user_instance_if_needed(
copy_instance: Optional[Union[Instance, PredictedInstance]],
frame_to_copy_from: LabeledFrame,
):
"""
Replaces a predicted instance with a user instance if available.
Args:
copy_instance: The instance to potentially replace.
frame_to_copy_from: The frame from which to find a user instance.
Returns:
The user instance if found; otherwise, returns the original instance.
"""
if isinstance(copy_instance, PredictedInstance):
# Set copy instance to last user instance in frame to copy from, if present
user_instance = AddInstance.find_last_user_instance(frame_to_copy_from)
if user_instance is not None:
return user_instance
return copy_instance

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bdffea and 61be664.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • sleap/gui/commands.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sleap/gui/commands.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants