Skip to content

Conversation

PavelFil
Copy link

Fix bug #21 (comment)

@rybakit
Copy link
Member

rybakit commented Nov 30, 2022

Thanks for the PR. Unfortunately I can't accept it because the issue you raised in #21 requires quite a bit of refactoring. Making the return type optional is not an option, as it would hurt the other queue APIs. So I think at the end the current Queue class should be ditched in favor of specific implementations for each queue type.

@rybakit rybakit closed this Nov 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants