Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replication tests fail sporadically with "User 'cluster' is not found" #3637

Closed
locker opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Replication tests fail sporadically with "User 'cluster' is not found" #3637

locker opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@locker
Copy link
Member

locker commented Aug 22, 2018

Reproduced by Travis CI on 1.10:

[011] replication/ddl.test.lua                        memtx           [ pass ]
[011] replication/ddl.test.lua                        vinyl           
[011] 
[011] [Instance "ddl4" returns with non-zero exit code: 1]
[011] 
[011] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "ddl4"][/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/ddl4.log]:
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.465 [10448] main/101/ddl4 C> log level 5
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.465 [10448] main/101/ddl4 I> mapping 268435456 bytes for memtx tuple arena...
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.465 [10448] main/101/ddl4 I> mapping 134217728 bytes for vinyl tuple arena...
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.468 [10448] iproto/101/main I> binary: bound to unix/:/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/autobootstrap4.sock
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.468 [10448] main/108/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> remote master is 1.10.1 at unix/:/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/autobootstrap2.sock
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/109/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> remote master is 1.10.1 at unix/:/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/autobootstrap3.sock
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> remote master is 1.10.1 at unix/:/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/autobootstrap1.sock
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/110/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> remote master is 1.10.1 at unix/:/tarantool/test/var/011_replication/autobootstrap4.sock
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> failed to authenticate
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo xrow.c:891 E> ER_LOADING: Instance bootstrap hasn't finished yet
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> failed to authenticate
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo xrow.c:891 E> ER_NO_SUCH_USER: User 'cluster' is not found
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/101/ddl4 xrow.c:891 E> ER_NO_SUCH_USER: User 'cluster' is not found
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/101/ddl4 F> can't initialize storage: User 'cluster' is not found
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/101/ddl4 F> can't initialize storage: User 'cluster' is not found
[011] [ fail ]
[Main process] Got failed test; gently terminate all workers...
[011] Worker "011_replication" got failed test; stopping the server...
@kyukhin kyukhin added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 22, 2018
@locker locker removed the bug Something isn't working label Aug 22, 2018
@kyukhin kyukhin added this to the 1.10.2 milestone Aug 23, 2018
@sergw
Copy link
Contributor

sergw commented Aug 23, 2018

I'm reproducing it using: TEST_RUN_TESTS=$(for i in $(seq 1 20); do echo -n 'replication/autobootstrap.test.lua '; done) make test
When changing TIMEOUT at autobootstrap.lua a little bit more (for example 0.2 instead of 0.1) then tests passed ok.
But after changing TIMEOUT to larger value (example 10) test slow down dramaticlly.

This two lines of log has a question:

[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.470 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo xrow.c:891 E> ER_LOADING: Instance bootstrap hasn't finished yet
[011] 2018-08-22 13:32:24.582 [10448] main/107/applier/cluster@unix/:/tarantoo I> failed to authenticate

why replica wants to authenticate until bootstraping master (with creating new user) was not done.

@sergepetrenko sergepetrenko added bug Something isn't working and removed flaky test labels Aug 23, 2018
@sergepetrenko
Copy link
Collaborator

This can be reproduced on every start with such script:

box.cfg({
    listen=3301,
    replication={
        "cluster:pass@localhost:3301",
        "cluster:pass@localhost:3302"
    },  
    replication_timeout=0.1,
    replication_connect_timeout=2.0
})

box.once("bootstrap", function()
    require("fiber").sleep(1)
    box.schema.user.create("cluster", {password="pass"})
    box.schema.user.grant("cluster", "replication")
    box.schema.space.create("test")
    box.space.test:create_index("primary")
end)

Second instance has the same script except that listen=3302 (obviously).
My guess is the issue happens every time when replication_timeout is smaller than box.once() execution time.

sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f().

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
@kyukhin kyukhin modified the milestones: 1.10.2, 1.9.2 Aug 24, 2018
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
sergepetrenko added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
locker pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2018
When replication is configured via some user created in box.once()
function and box.once() takes more than replication_timeout seconds
to execute, appliers recieve ER_NO_SUCH_USER error, which they don't
handle. This leads to occasional test failures in replication suite.
Fix this by handling the aforementioned case in applier_f() and add a
test case.

Closes #3637
@locker
Copy link
Member Author

locker commented Aug 24, 2018

Fixed by 3395016

@locker locker closed this as completed Aug 24, 2018
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-assert-on-server-die.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-value-not-replicated-on-iproto-request.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-no-panic-on-connected.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3704-misc-replica-checks-cluster-id.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-assert-on-server-die.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-value-not-replicated-on-iproto-request.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-no-panic-on-connected.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3704-misc-replica-checks-cluster-id.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-asserts-on-update.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3704-misc-replica-checks-cluster-id.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-asserts-on-update.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940

(cherry picked from commit c7e6627)
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-asserts-on-update.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3704-misc-replica-checks-cluster-id.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2020
To fix flaky issues of replication/misc.test.lua the test had to be
divided into smaller tests to be able to localize the flaky results:

  gh-2991-misc-asserts-on-update.test.lua
  gh-3111-misc-rebootstrap-from-ro-master.test.lua
  gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua
  gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua
  gh-3510-misc-assert-replica-on-applier-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3606-misc-crash-on-box-concurrent-update.test.lua
  gh-3610-misc-assert-connecting-master-twice.test.lua
  gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua
  gh-3642-misc-no-socket-leak-on-replica-disconnect.test.lua
  gh-3704-misc-replica-checks-cluster-id.test.lua
  gh-3711-misc-no-restart-on-same-configuration.test.lua
  gh-3760-misc-return-on-quorum-0.test.lua
  gh-4399-misc-no-failure-on-error-reading-wal.test.lua
  gh-4424-misc-orphan-on-reconfiguration-error.test.lua

Needed for #4940

(cherry picked from commit 867e6b3)
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336

t
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/hash_collation.test.lua		gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua			gh-5247
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/gh-2763-session-credentials-update.test.lua gh-5363
  box/hash_collation.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_connect_triggers_gh-2858.test.lua	gh-5247
  box/net.box_incompatible_index-gh-1729.test.lua gh-5360
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua				gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua				gh-5247
  box-tap/net.box.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/prune.test.lua			gh-5361
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  replication-py/multi.test.py			gh-5362
  sql/prepared.test.lua test			gh-5359
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/gh-2763-session-credentials-update.test.lua gh-5363
  box/hash_collation.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_connect_triggers_gh-2858.test.lua	gh-5247
  box/net.box_incompatible_index-gh-1729.test.lua gh-5360
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua				gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua				gh-5247
  box-tap/net.box.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/prune.test.lua			gh-5361
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  replication-py/multi.test.py			gh-5362
  sql/prepared.test.lua test			gh-5359
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/gh-2763-session-credentials-update.test.lua gh-5363
  box/hash_collation.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_connect_triggers_gh-2858.test.lua	gh-5247
  box/net.box_incompatible_index-gh-1729.test.lua gh-5360
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua				gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua				gh-5247
  box-tap/net.box.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/prune.test.lua			gh-5361
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  replication-py/multi.test.py			gh-5362
  sql/prepared.test.lua test			gh-5359
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348

(cherry picked from commit 75ba744)
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/gh-2763-session-credentials-update.test.lua gh-5363
  box/hash_collation.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_connect_triggers_gh-2858.test.lua	gh-5247
  box/net.box_incompatible_index-gh-1729.test.lua gh-5360
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua				gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua				gh-5247
  box-tap/net.box.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/prune.test.lua			gh-5361
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  replication-py/multi.test.py			gh-5362
  sql/prepared.test.lua test			gh-5359
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348

(cherry picked from commit 75ba744)
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2020
Added for tests with issues:
  app/fiber.test.lua				gh-5341
  app-tap/debug.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/http_client.test.lua			gh-5346
  app-tap/inspector.test.lua			gh-5346
  box/gh-2763-session-credentials-update.test.lua gh-5363
  box/hash_collation.test.lua			gh-5247
  box/lua.test.lua				gh-5351
  box/net.box_connect_triggers_gh-2858.test.lua	gh-5247
  box/net.box_incompatible_index-gh-1729.test.lua gh-5360
  box/net.box_on_schema_reload-gh-1904.test.lua gh-5354
  box/protocol.test.lua				gh-5247
  box/update.test.lua				gh-5247
  box-tap/net.box.test.lua			gh-5346
  replication/autobootstrap.test.lua		gh-4533
  replication/autobootstrap_guest.test.lua	gh-4533
  replication/ddl.test.lua			gh-5337
  replication/gh-3160-misc-heartbeats-on-master-changes.test.lua gh-4940
  replication/gh-3247-misc-iproto-sequence-value-not-replicated.test.lua.test.lua gh-5357
  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua gh-5343
  replication/long_row_timeout.test.lua		gh-4351
  replication/on_replace.test.lua		gh-5344, gh-5349
  replication/prune.test.lua			gh-5361
  replication/qsync_advanced.test.lua		gh-5340
  replication/qsync_basic.test.lua		gh-5355
  replication/replicaset_ro_mostly.test.lua	gh-5342
  replication/wal_rw_stress.test.lua		gh-5347
  replication-py/multi.test.py			gh-5362
  sql/prepared.test.lua test			gh-5359
  sql-tap/selectG.test.lua			gh-5350
  vinyl/ddl.test.lua				gh-5338
  vinyl/gh-3395-read-prepared-uncommitted.test.lua gh-5197
  vinyl/iterator.test.lua			gh-5336
  vinyl/write_iterator_rand.test.lua	gh-5356
  xlog/panic_on_wal_error.test.lua		gh-5348

(cherry picked from commit 75ba744)
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
avtikhon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
kyukhin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2020
Met flaky issues on test:

  replication/gh-3637-misc-error-on-replica-auth-fail.test.lua

Found memory leaks:

[093] Last 15 lines of Tarantool Log file [Instance "replica_auth"][/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/test/var/093_replication/replica_auth.log]:
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)
[093]
[093] Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
[093]     #0 0x525dfa in calloc (/builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/tarantool+0x525dfa)
[093]     #1 0xa2eb4a in mh_i64ptr_new /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/salad/mhash.h:408:22
[093]     #2 0x8a516d in vy_recovery_new_f /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/box/vy_log.c:2321:23
[093]     #3 0xa13df8 in coio_on_call /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/src/lib/core/coio_task.c:264:16
[093]     #4 0xfcedbe in eio_execute /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/eio.c:2015:9
[093]     #5 0xfcedbe in etp_proc /builds/DtQXhC5e/0/tarantool/tarantool/third_party/libeio/etp.c:373
[093]     #6 0x7f8c8260ffa2 in start_thread (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x7fa2)

To stabilize testing these leaks added as suppressions to asan list.

Part of #5343
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants