Join GitHub today
change how ReturnIfAbrupt and its shorthands are specified #1573
In #1570, we discussed how the way ReturnIfAbrupt and its shorthands are specified is unclear. I've made it clear that the ReturnIfAbrupt equivalence is on sequences of algorithm steps and the shorthand is a simple replacement in any context.
I've updated the
I recommend reading the current and proposed spec text separately to review. The diff will not be very helpful.
This will obsolete #1570.