-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TG2-VALIDATION_SUBTRIBE_FOUND #208
Comments
Needs review. Parallels other validations that evaluate single higher rank terms. Entailed by tdwg/dwc#46 |
After discussion in TG2, marking this as NOT CORE. This is the position we have taken for similar tests for other sub/super ranks. Also, appears that a current implementation against the desired default bdq:sourceAuthority of GBIF's backbone taxonomy would return NOT_COMPLIANT for any non-empty dwc:subtribe values, as GBIF does not appear to have subtribe data in the backbone taxonomy. |
See: #206 (comment) |
Splitting Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated" deleted "Warning Type" |
…and tdwg/bdq#208 not empty tests that evaluate recently added Dwarwin Core classification terms in the ranks superfamily, tribe, and subtribe, where the default GBIF backbone taxonomy does not yet provide data. Including integration tests with cases that work in WoRMS, with GBIF cases that should return COMPLIANT, but don't, commented out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: