Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix v1beta1.CustomRun GVK #6562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2023
Merged

Fix v1beta1.CustomRun GVK #6562

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2023

Conversation

wlynch
Copy link
Member

@wlynch wlynch commented Apr 19, 2023

Changes

Follow up to #6531 (comment)

This was using Runs but should be CustomRuns.
Be aware this is potentially breaking behavior, but is a bug fix to what the value should be.

/kind bug

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs if any changes are user facing, including updates to minimum requirements e.g. Kubernetes version bumps
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

BREAKING CHANGE: v1beta1.CustomRuns GVK was changed to properly match it's type (Runs -> CustomRuns). This may break relationships that are relying on the incorrect GVK value. Clients not relying on the GVK value from the Go type are unaffected.

This was using `Runs` but should be `CustomRuns`.
Be aware this is potentially breaking behavior, but is a bug fix to what
the value should be.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Apr 19, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 19, 2023
@jsminem
Copy link
Contributor

jsminem commented Apr 19, 2023

Thanks so much!
/kind cleanup

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Apr 19, 2023
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 19, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @wlynch!

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 79f6e4c into tektoncd:main Apr 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants