Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Increase the publish timeout #7215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Increase the publish timeout #7215

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

afrittoli
Copy link
Member

Changes

Increase the publish timeout to 2h.

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs if any changes are user facing, including updates to minimum requirements e.g. Kubernetes version bumps
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings). See some examples of good release notes.
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

/kind misc

@afrittoli
Increase the publish timeout
dee179b 
Increase the publish timeout to 2h. The previous increase to 1h20'
was not enough and the task timedout again.

This will require the overall `PipelineRun` timeout to be increased
too.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Frittoli <andrea.frittoli@uk.ibm.com>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. labels Oct 13, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 13, 2023
@afrittoli afrittoli mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2023
Merged
7 tasks
vdemeester
vdemeester approved these changes Oct 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2023
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester, Yongxuanzhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 16, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 0689032 into tektoncd:release-v0.50.x Oct 16, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vdemeester vdemeester vdemeester approved these changes

@Yongxuanzhang Yongxuanzhang Yongxuanzhang approved these changes

@jerop jerop Awaiting requested review from jerop

@lbernick lbernick Awaiting requested review from lbernick

Assignees

@vdemeester vdemeester

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@afrittoli @tekton-robot @vdemeester @Yongxuanzhang