Make TestWorkflowService#continueAsNew respect headers of the original StartWorkflowExecutionRequest #419
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Spikhalskiy
requested review from
Sushisource,
mfateev and
vitarb
as code owners
Spikhalskiy
force-pushed
the
continueAsNew-testService-headers
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3c2506c to
e5cf1a3
Compare
…l StartWorkflowExecutionRequest Addresses temporalio#420
Spikhalskiy
force-pushed
the
continueAsNew-testService-headers
branch
from
e5cf1a3 to
a8522af
Compare
mfateev
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed:
TestWorkflowService#continueAsNewnow uses header from the originalStartWorkflowExecutionRequestfor the newStartWorkflowRequest.Why?
Headers are kinda hidden input parameters (or a context) of the workflow and should be transferred into the new execution without omitting.
Closes
Issue #420