Skip to content

update to checkpoint callback options (save_frequency) #2042

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

gdarkwah
Copy link
Contributor

@gdarkwah gdarkwah commented Mar 2, 2022

introduced the number of batches ('n_batches') option for the save frequency instead of 'batch_size'. Using 'batch_size' works in this tutorial because the length of the training data is 1000 which coincidentally results in a rounded value of ~32 when it is divided by the 'batch_size'. In cases when the number of samples is not 1000, this will result in the model saving at different epoch frequencies other than after every 5 epochs.

the definition of 'save_freq' (https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/callbacks/ModelCheckpoint#args) clearly refers to the number of batches ('n_batches' in this context) and not the number of samples in a batch ('batch_size').

introduced the number of batches ('n_batches') option for the save frequency instead of  'batch_size'. Using 'batch_size' works in this tutorial because the length of the training data is 1000 which coincidentally results in a rounded value of ~32 when it is divided by the 'batch_size'. In cases when the number of samples is not 1000, this will result in the model saving at different epoch frequencies other than after every 5 epochs.

the definition of 'save_freq' (https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/callbacks/ModelCheckpoint#args) clearly refers to the number of batches ('n_batches' in this context) and not the number of samples in a batch ('batch_size').
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Mar 2, 2022

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

For more information, open the CLA check for this pull request.

@8bitmp3 8bitmp3 self-assigned this Mar 4, 2022
@8bitmp3
Copy link
Contributor

8bitmp3 commented Mar 27, 2023

@MarkDaoust @markmcd PTAL

MarkDaoust
MarkDaoust previously approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lgtm Community-added approval label Mar 28, 2023
@8bitmp3 8bitmp3 added ready to pull Start merge process and removed awaiting-technical-review labels Mar 29, 2023
@8bitmp3 8bitmp3 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2023 21:37
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit dd0a65e into tensorflow:master Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Community-added approval ready to pull Start merge process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants