Adding mentions to Denoised Smoothing #105
Conversation
research/README.md
Outdated
| `third_party` directory contains research project contributions from the open source | ||
| community. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think that's the intent of the third_party directory here. @DualityGap, any thoughts on this? My understanding is that this indicates that contributions here are built on top of other third_party implementations (https://github.com/microsoft/denoised-smoothing in this example). So, I'd suggest removing these 2 lines. As another counterexample, the gnn-survey directory was also a community contribution but that was a from-scratch implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see. In this case, you are right. I have reused some of the bits from the official implementation (with all the citations) and reimplemented bits that were absolutely necessary to make things work in TensorFlow and Keras. I will reword the phrasing then.
research/README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| The implementations of Denoised Smoothing [5] are provided in the | ||
| `neural_clustering` folder on a strict "as is" basis, without warranties or |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo. Not neural_clustering but third_party/denoised_smoothing.
research/README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## [Denoised Smoothing: A Provable Defense for Pretrained Classifiers](third_party/denoised_smoothing) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
research/README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| [[5] H. Salman, M.Sun, C. Mitelut, G. Yang, A. Kapoor., Z. Kolter "Denoised Smoothing: | ||
| A Provable Defense for Pretrained Classifiers." NeurIPS 2020](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01908) | ||
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 399526290
No description provided.