Skip to content

Conversation

tflori
Copy link
Owner

@tflori tflori commented Dec 23, 2016

This will solve #4

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 97.674% when pulling 785d15d on feature-nested-translations into ad01588 on master.

This will never happen for json objects and therefore it is hard to mock.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.877% when pulling 2af8397 on feature-nested-translations into ad01588 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.877% when pulling 0ec33da on feature-nested-translations into ad01588 on master.

@tflori
Copy link
Owner Author

tflori commented Dec 23, 2016

duplicate from #6

@tflori tflori closed this Dec 23, 2016
@tflori tflori deleted the feature-nested-translations branch December 23, 2016 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants