Skip to content

Adding support for UNION queries #41

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 17, 2017

Conversation

moufmouf
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@moufmouf
Copy link
Member Author

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 66.594% when pulling 97698eb on moufmouf:union_query into b9e4815 on thecodingmachine:1.2.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 67.339% when pulling 4ca2eb0 on moufmouf:union_query into b9e4815 on thecodingmachine:1.2.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 67.339% when pulling 4f79db6 on moufmouf:union_query into b9e4815 on thecodingmachine:1.2.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 67.339% when pulling 4f79db6 on moufmouf:union_query into b9e4815 on thecodingmachine:1.2.

@moufmouf moufmouf merged commit cb2efea into thecodingmachine:1.2 Nov 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants