Skip to content

Conversation

jessleenyc
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation Update

Description

  • Allow admins to see dashboards
  • Toggle 'trusted' role from users/internal
  • Toggle 'video permission' from users/internal
  • Add additional info to internal/users
  • Make .banished? more specific so banish button will still appear on internal even if it times out.

@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: unreviewed bot applied label for PR's with no review label Feb 5, 2019

<h2> Possible Mentors </h2>
<% count = 0 %>
<% MentorRelationship.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, the method chain here is bewildering! Is it possible to stuff all these away into either a presenter or create a scope in the model?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, @jessleenyc I think we can plop more stuff like this into article_decorator to clean things up and for re-use in the future.

@pr-triage pr-triage bot added PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes and removed PR: unreviewed bot applied label for PR's with no review labels Feb 6, 2019
@benhalpern benhalpern merged commit 0090012 into forem:master Feb 6, 2019
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added PR: merged bot applied label for PR's that are merged PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes and removed PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes PR: merged bot applied label for PR's that are merged labels Feb 6, 2019
@jessleenyc jessleenyc deleted the jess/team-60-64 branch July 29, 2024 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: reviewed-approved bot applied label for PR's where reviewer approves changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants