Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing glmnet method for proportional hazard models #1086

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

topepo
Copy link
Member

@topepo topepo commented Mar 21, 2024

There was no coxnet method.

@topepo
Copy link
Member Author

topepo commented Mar 21, 2024

Tests will be added to extratests

@topepo topepo requested a review from hfrick March 21, 2024 15:15
Copy link
Member

@hfrick hfrick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

NEWS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Hannah Frick <hfrick@users.noreply.github.com>
@topepo topepo merged commit 0e49f78 into main Mar 22, 2024
7 checks passed
@topepo topepo deleted the tidy-coxnet branch March 22, 2024 10:36
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2024

This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants