revise(module) to force reevaluating every expression

[cstjean]

As suggested in #33 (comment)

Issues:

• I like revise(module) as a verb, but it's not entirely obvious what it's going to do. forcerevise(module)?
• Both here and in TraceCalls.jl, I get the module files from parse_pkg_files, which seems a tad wasteful given that those files were already parsed. We could maintain module2files.
• revise(module) triggers a lot of redefinition warnings. In ClobberingReload I use this code. We could move over scrub_stderr to Revise.jl

This is a work-around for #20 and #31, I'll leave you to decide if you want to close these issues.

[cstjean]

Sorry - accidental click.

[timholy]

If you're up for the module2files route, I think I'd prefer that.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #41 into master will increase coverage by 0.45%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #41      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.16%   83.61%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         297      293       -4     
==========================================
- Hits          247      245       -2     
+ Misses         50       48       -2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Revise.jl	83.61% <100%> (+0.45%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 00cc2da...9c9802f. Read the comment docs.

[timholy]

Thanks a bunch!

The OSX tests routinely fail at the "cleanup" step. I don't suppose you can reproduce that yourself, can you? If so, does adding a sleep or something fix it?

[cstjean]

I've seen it a few times, I'll try to fix it.