forked from VaughnVernon/IDDD_Samples
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
These are the sample Bounded Contexts from the book "Implementing Domain-Driven Design" by Vaughn Vernon: http://vaughnvernon.co/?page_id=168
License
tmohme/IDDD_Samples
Folders and files
Name | Name | Last commit message | Last commit date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repository files navigation
These are the sample Bounded Contexts from the book "Implementing Domain-Driven Design" by Vaughn Vernon: http://vaughnvernon.co/?page_id=168 The models and surrounding architectural mechanisms may be in various states of flux as the are refined over time. Some tests may be incomplete. The code is not meant to be a reflection of a production quality work, but rather as a set of reference projects for the book. Points of Interest ------------------ The iddd_agilepm project uses a key-value store as its underlying persistence mechanism, and in particular is LevelDB. Actually the LevelDB in use is a pure Java implementation: https://github.com/dain/leveldb Currently iddd_agilepm doesn't employ a container of any kind (such as Spring). The iddd_collaboration project uses Event Sourcing and CQRS. It purposely avoids the use of an object-relational mapper, showing that a simple JDBC-based query engine and DTO matter can be used instead. This technique does have its limitations, but it is meant to be small and fast and require no configuration or annotations. It is not meant to be perfect. It may be helpful to make one additional mental note on the iddd_collaboration CQRS implementation. To keep the example simple it persists the Event Sourced write model and the CQRS read model in one thread. Since two different stores are used--LevelDB for the Event Journal and MySQL for the read model--there may be very slight opportunities for inconsistency, but not much. The idea was to keep the two models as close to consistent as possible without using the same data storage (and transaction) for both. Two different storage mechanisms were used purposely to demonstrate that they can be separate. The iddd_identityaccess project uses uses object-relational mapping (Hibernate), but so as not to leave it "boring" it provides a RESTful client interface and even publishes Domain-Event notifications via REST (logs) and RabbitMQ. Finally the iddd_common project provides a number of reusable components. This is not an attempt to be a framework, but just leverages reuse to the degree that code copying doesn't liter each project. This is not a recommendation, but it did work well and save a considerable amount of work while producing the samples. Build ------ The Gradle build using Maven repositories was provided by Michael Andrews (Github michaelajr and Twitter @MichaelAJr). Thanks much! I hope you benefit from the samples. Vaughn Vernon Author: Implementing Domain-Driven Design Twitter: @VaughnVernon http://vaughnvernon.co/
About
These are the sample Bounded Contexts from the book "Implementing Domain-Driven Design" by Vaughn Vernon: http://vaughnvernon.co/?page_id=168
Resources
License
Stars
Watchers
Forks
Releases
No releases published
Packages 0
No packages published