Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(presets): iframe and image templates #6772

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

fundon
Copy link
Contributor

@fundon fundon commented Apr 16, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into master

Add the label “merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 16, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blocksuite ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 16, 2024 9:00am
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blocksuite-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 16, 2024 9:00am

Copy link
Contributor Author

fundon commented Apr 16, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @fundon and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Merge activity

@pengx17 pengx17 force-pushed the 04_16_refactor-iframe-and-image-templates branch from caa7ff1 to 59f64c9 Compare April 16, 2024 08:56
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 59f64c9 into master Apr 16, 2024
19 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 04_16_refactor-iframe-and-image-templates branch April 16, 2024 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants