Kernelize Atom and QVar #709
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Odomontois
requested review from
catostrophe,
danslapman,
FunFunFine and
oskin1
as code owners
This was referenced Jul 16, 2021
FunFunFine
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2021
7 tasks
gurinderu
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The breaking thing here is
AtomByRefandQVarByMVarbeing moved to thetofu.interoppackageQVarByMVar now requires MVar2 (not so breaking)
New approach to careful carrying instances through macros requires separate carrier type for each implementation.
Carriers are now bare traits, subtypes of carried type.
Existing carriers refactored to the same encoding.