Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #139

Closed
57 of 63 tasks
carllerche opened this issue Feb 15, 2018 · 65 comments
Closed
57 of 63 tasks

License under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #139

carllerche opened this issue Feb 15, 2018 · 65 comments

Comments

@carllerche
Copy link
Member

carllerche commented Feb 15, 2018

The repository currently does not have an associated license, preventing some from contributing.

In order to fully relicense this repository, all contributors must sign-off.

You are receiving this notification because you have contributed to this repo.

While smaller changes can't be copyrighted by law, its non-trivial to find out with certainty whether a given change falls under copyright or not, due to the nature of the matter. Therefore I'm asking you to agree to the new terms even if you consider your contributions to be not copyrightable.

Checkoff

To agree to the licensing terms, please comment with:

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

Thank you!

@carllerche
Copy link
Member Author

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

9 similar comments
@jasondavies
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@hockeybuggy
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@khaledkbadr
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@phrohdoh
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@oconnor663
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@schleumer
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@radupopescu
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@justinmayhew
Copy link
Contributor

justinmayhew commented Feb 15, 2018 via email

@SuperFluffy
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@nelsonjchen
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@srijs
Copy link
Contributor

srijs commented Feb 15, 2018 via email

@zmanian
Copy link
Contributor

zmanian commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@shepmaster
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@ineol
Copy link
Contributor

ineol commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

3 similar comments
@mre
Copy link
Contributor

mre commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@aturon
Copy link
Contributor

aturon commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@kw217
Copy link

kw217 commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@kanerogers
Copy link
Contributor

kanerogers commented Feb 15, 2018 via email

@vi
Copy link
Contributor

vi commented Feb 15, 2018

I license past and future contributions to this repository under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@AaronStGeorge
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

6 similar comments
@CrockAgile
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@theduke
Copy link
Contributor

theduke commented Feb 16, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@RadicalZephyr
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@tanimoto
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@Rufflewind
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@mohammadsamir
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@rbalicki2
Copy link
Contributor

rbalicki2 commented Feb 22, 2018 via email

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@dwrensha
Copy link
Contributor

Word.

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@jedisct1
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

1 similar comment
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

1 similar comment
@jefflembeck
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@radupopescu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
I replied 20 days ago.
Cheers,

@acobster
Copy link
Contributor

acobster commented Mar 7, 2018

Sounds good to me! :)

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@iamcodemaker
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

5 similar comments
@mgattozzi
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@schuster
Copy link
Contributor

schuster commented Mar 7, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@redaready
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@P-E-Meunier
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@mquandalle
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@carllerche
Copy link
Member Author

@radupopescu Woops, sorry about that. Got you this time!

@rofrol
Copy link
Contributor

rofrol commented Mar 8, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@radupopescu
Copy link
Contributor

@carllerche No worries! Cheers!

@zklapow
Copy link
Contributor

zklapow commented May 25, 2018

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

@carllerche
Copy link
Member Author

@tobz
Copy link
Member

tobz commented Aug 2, 2018

Roll call! @munckymagik @sheeldotme @braddunbar @lazyval @toddWannaCode @hngnaig

@sheeldotme
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.

carllerche added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2019
Issue #139 tracks explicit licensing of existing newly created content
under MIT / Apache2. However, the repository also contains substantial
content from the bootstrap project. As such, it must be licensed under
MIT exclusively.
@carllerche
Copy link
Member Author

Authors for all existing content on master have been covered by this issue. As such, I will close. Thanks all.

carllerche added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2019
Issue #139 tracks explicit licensing of existing newly created content
under MIT / Apache2. However, the repository also contains substantial
content from the bootstrap project. As such, it must be licensed under
MIT exclusively.
jefflembeck pushed a commit to jefflembeck/website that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2020
…toring

Update contributors list, reorganize about team content
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests