-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #139
Comments
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
9 similar comments
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
|
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
…On Fri, Feb 16, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Carl Lerche wrote:
The repository currently does not have an associated license,
[preventing] some from contributing.
[preventing]: #124
In order to fully relicense this repository, all contributors must
sign-off.>
You are receiving this notification because you have contributed to
this repo.>
While smaller changes can't be copyrighted by law, its non-trivial to> find out with certainty whether a given change falls under
copyright or> not, due to the nature of the matter. Therefore I'm asking you
to agree> to the new terms even if you consider your contributions to be not
copyrightable.
# Checkoff
To agree to the licensing terms, please comment with:
> I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-
> 2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.>
Thank you!
* [ ] @alexcrichton
* [ ] @aturon
* [ ] @carllerche
* [ ] @nelsonjchen
* [ ] @hockeybuggy
* [ ] @rbalicki2
* [ ] @shepmaster
* [ ] @RadicalZephyr
* [ ] @munckymagik
* [ ] @khaledkbadr
* [ ] @funkill
* [ ] @Rufflewind
* [ ] @vi
* [ ] @mbrubeck
* [ ] @radupopescu
* [ ] @irtefa
* [ ] @SuperFluffy
* [ ] @theduke
* [ ] @phrohdoh
* [ ] @tafia
* [ ] @sheeldotme
* [ ] @kanerogers
* [ ] @braddunbar
* [ ] @lazyval
* [ ] @toddWannaCode
* [ ] @oconnor663
* [ ] @mohammadsamir
* [ ] @hngnaig
* [ ] @DirkyJerky
* [ ] @mayhewj
* [ ] @jasondavies
* [ ] @DmitryBochkarev
* [ ] @zmanian
* [ ] @baloo
* [ ] @schleumer
* [ ] @jbendig
* [ ] @mre
* [ ] @dfockler
* [ ] @ineol
* [ ] @daschl
* [ ] @srijs
* [ ] @Freyskeyd
* [ ] @danobi
* [ ] @kw217
* [ ] @AaronStGeorge
* [ ] @jedisct1
* [ ] @CrockAgile
* [ ] @tanimoto
* [ ] @awelkie
* [ ] @matematikaadit
* [ ] @rofrol
* [ ] @jefflembeck
* [ ] @mquandalle
* [ ] @iamcodemaker
* [ ] @zklapow
* [ ] @schuster
* [ ] @acobster
* [ ] @cgwalters
* [ ] @P-E-Meunier
* [ ] @mgattozzi
* [ ] @steveklabnik
* [ ] @dwrensha
* [ ] @redaready
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#139
|
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
3 similar comments
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
…On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, 8:57 AM Keith Wansbrough ***@***.***> wrote:
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#139 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB7b56fQAxwdXhGwSMm1XJKGoRO-afFTks5tVKhTgaJpZM4SHiWa>
.
|
I license past and future contributions to this repository under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
6 similar comments
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
…On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:20 AM, msamir ***@***.***> wrote:
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0
license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#139 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFDVZNyfMZ4La98AuPRmCHaV1qmoSCvks5tXTFZgaJpZM4SHiWa>
.
|
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
Word. I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
1 similar comment
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
1 similar comment
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
Hi, |
Sounds good to me! :) I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
5 similar comments
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
@radupopescu Woops, sorry about that. Got you this time! |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
@carllerche No worries! Cheers! |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
Ping: @munckymagik @sheeldotme @braddunbar @lazyval @toddWannaCode @hngnaig |
Roll call! @munckymagik @sheeldotme @braddunbar @lazyval @toddWannaCode @hngnaig |
I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose either at their option. |
Issue #139 tracks explicit licensing of existing newly created content under MIT / Apache2. However, the repository also contains substantial content from the bootstrap project. As such, it must be licensed under MIT exclusively.
Authors for all existing content on master have been covered by this issue. As such, I will close. Thanks all. |
Issue #139 tracks explicit licensing of existing newly created content under MIT / Apache2. However, the repository also contains substantial content from the bootstrap project. As such, it must be licensed under MIT exclusively.
…toring Update contributors list, reorganize about team content
The repository currently does not have an associated license, preventing some from contributing.
In order to fully relicense this repository, all contributors must sign-off.
You are receiving this notification because you have contributed to this repo.
While smaller changes can't be copyrighted by law, its non-trivial to find out with certainty whether a given change falls under copyright or not, due to the nature of the matter. Therefore I'm asking you to agree to the new terms even if you consider your contributions to be not copyrightable.
Checkoff
To agree to the licensing terms, please comment with:
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: