Repository navigation
Replies: 3 comments
|
This is a feature request/inquiry, not a report of an existing defect: it asks whether a proposed Brevo emailing driver would be accepted as a Community driver or fall under Enterprise. Severity is UNDEFINED because no broken behavior is reported. No root-cause hypothesis applies. No reproduction steps, version, or screenshots are provided; those are not needed to answer the policy question. |
|
Hi Stefan, thanks for asking! We're not very clear on the strategy for drivers/licensing yet since emailing is a new product that isn't officially launched yet. I'd say it makes sense to have a EU-only provider in community but brevo seems a bit too "high level" for me, I would have preferred something that overlaps less with Twenty and is more infra-level (and therefore also cheaper). So I would advise to hold on for now, sorry :( |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We self-host Twenty in the EU and would like to run campaigns and email groups through Brevo (EU-based; its API covers domain authentication, batch sends, bounce/complaint webhooks and inbound parsing). We'd contribute a complete
BREVOdriver following the Resend driver from #24202: domain find-or-create and verification, sending, a signed bounce/complaint webhook into the neutral suppression handlers, and an inbound message source for email groups.Before we start: would you accept it as a Community driver, like Resend, or would it fall under the Enterprise split from #24206?
All reactions