Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backports for a cats-1.6.x patch #2861

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 3, 2019

Conversation

Ben Plommer and others added 4 commits May 25, 2019 22:44
…evel#2810)

* Add regression test for MonadErrorOps bug

* Change MonadErrorOps#reject so it no longer re-runs the effect it is called on. Fixes typelevel#2809
Changed description to better fit their implentation
We are running into Spark `Task not serializable` issues when a closure
that executes on a Spark executor node involves a `Map` that is created
via running `foldMap` on a `List`. This commit makes the
`WrappedMutableMap` hierarchy extend `Serializable` and chex that the
cerealization works (this test failed before extending `Serializable`).
@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the backport. I wish we didn't need to do this. It's unfortunate that we got held up by a dependency only needed for cats-testKit. I have been trying for months but couldn't get an ETA on scalatest 3.1.0 release. Maybe we should consider extract cats-testKit to an external module?

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Any thoughts on going all the way to a 1.7 vs this more modest approach?

@LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

LukaJCB commented May 29, 2019

I think the more modest approach makes sense, I'd rather focus on getting 2.0 out the door, e.g. by pulling out cats-testkit

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Okay. I should be able to release this tonight.

@rossabaker rossabaker merged commit de0056b into typelevel:1.6.x Jun 3, 2019
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the Excluded from release notes milestone Jun 4, 2019
@rossabaker rossabaker deleted the 1.6.1-backports branch June 14, 2020 04:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants