Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.41pre #420

Open
wants to merge 42 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

1.41pre #420

wants to merge 42 commits into from

Conversation

Wolfr
Copy link
Contributor

@Wolfr Wolfr commented Nov 29, 2021

This is the PR to track 1.41, which removes core from projects using Bedrock. This achieves a better separation of concerns as noted in @thusc 's comment here.

The first idea behind this was formulated in #320 . Through work in multiple branches we finally got to this result.

With a core-less Bedrock, bedrock becomes an npm dependency of a project. Your project repo will look a lot simpler - example at https://github.com/thusc/bedrock/tree/bedrock-init/

As a user you can:

  1. Build a prototype, using the page tree, with a standard styleguide
  2. Build a design system website, with custom templates for styleguide type pages

You can still use the pagetree in scenario 2 but it will make less sense. It is advisable to disable the page tree in this scenario.

To enable scenario 2 (I.e. the strategy used for https://design.smart.coop/ ) you would set overrideStyleguideTemplates to true in bedrock.config.js.

You would then supply your own templates in /content/templates/_styleguide/ that override Bedrock's default templates.

thusc and others added 30 commits November 27, 2021 18:04
This will make it possible to cleanly separate Bedrock's templates from
the user project templates.
This calls the Gulpfile main task, 'build'.
This allows to run `bedrock build` from a directory that contains
content/ but not core/.
The goal is to allow to do something like

  npm install git+https://github.com/thusc/bedrock.git#cli

and have a working Bedrock program.
This supposes that the current directory doesn't have a core Bedrock
install, but instead used a standalone Bedrock program.
This is supposed to contribute to
#391.
This one is equivalent to `npm start` in a regular Bedrock install.
This commit changes where Bedrock development server is looking for
templates. Instead of using the local core/ directoy, it directs Bedrock
to its own core/ directory.

In addition, to allow styleguide templates to live in the local project,
this commit adds an underscore prefix to the _styleguide/ directory.

(The underscore is used to make sure those .pug files are not part of
the main content processed by the static build.)
# Conflicts:
#	core/paths.js
#	core/templates/styleguide/doc.pug
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 29, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/monocompany/bedrock/42XAy7Wx7MtHT9wLgXdA4271znQU
✅ Preview: https://bedrock-git-141pre-monocompany.vercel.app

[Deployment for eb4fb6a failed]

# Conflicts:
#	package-lock.json
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants