Repository navigation
Validation errors
The validation analyzer inspects a saved baseline without training, changing thresholds or reading test imagery. Use a new output directory:
uv run --locked --extra baseline pvextent evaluate validation \
data/pv4ger-seg-geographic-v1 runs/baseline-resnet18-001/best.pt \
artifacts/baseline-resnet18-errors-001 --device mps --top-k 12 --jsonChoose the device used by the original run for the closest reproduction.
--device auto is also supported. The model is restored offline from best.pt
after verifying its SHA-256 companion. Dataset and validation-selection
fingerprints must match the checkpoint. The recorded batch size, native pixels,
ImageNet normalization and threshold are retained. No optimizer is constructed.
The analyzer only constructs a val dataset view; even invalid or unavailable
test raster files are outside its pixel-access path.
When device and package versions match the checkpoint, the analysis must reproduce its validation TP/FP/FN/TN exactly. A mismatch fails without publishing a partial gallery. Other devices can produce slightly different predictions; the report records both the execution context and whether counts match.
Every selected validation crop receives masked integer confusion counts and pixel IoU, Dice, precision and recall. Global scores sum all pixel counts first. Macro IoU gives each crop equal weight; median and minimum expose the score distribution. Undefined IoU, where neither source nor prediction has PV, is excluded from macro statistics and counted explicitly.
Additional strata distinguish:
- Total source-labelled PV area per crop: below 10 m², 10 to below 50 m², and at least 50 m². These are crop-level area bins, not individual array sizes.
- Crops with source PV touching their image boundary versus those without.
- Errors near source-label boundaries versus errors further from them.
The boundary diagnostic uses a fixed three-pixel Chebyshev neighbourhood. A pixel is near a boundary when its 7 × 7 neighbourhood contains valid source PV and valid background. At 0.1 m/pixel this radius is 0.3 m along the image axes. Any neighbourhood containing ignored pixels is excluded from boundary/interior classification; its errors are reported as unclassified. Space outside the crop supplies no artificial PV, background or ignore labels.
Boundary errors, interior errors and unclassified errors sum to all FP plus FN pixels. This is an error-location diagnostic. It does not forgive boundary errors, modify ground truth, optimize a tolerance or replace the original IoU.
Open OUTPUT/index.html directly in a browser. It contains the union of the
--top-k lowest-IoU, most-FP-pixel and most-FN-pixel crops. Selection is
deterministic, with sample-ID tie breaking; the same example can belong to more
than one ranking. This gallery deliberately emphasizes errors and is not a
representative sample for estimating performance.
Each example shows RGB, source labels, prediction and error map. Green means TP, red FP, blue FN, gray TN and orange ignore. Click a panel to inspect native pixels. Original dataset metadata and available source notices accompany the export. Source masks and annotation status are unchanged.
| Artifact | Contents |
|---|---|
analysis-report.json |
Aggregate metrics, strata, execution context, rankings and input hashes |
samples.json |
Measurements for every selected validation crop, plus selected display paths |
predictions/ |
Native 0/1 prediction PNGs for all analyzed crops |
views/ |
Diagnostic display PNGs for ranked examples |
index.html |
Offline review gallery |
dataset.toml, provenance/
|
Original source metadata and available notices |
Existing outputs are never overwritten. Real imagery, labels, predictions and
per-sample measurements belong in the ignored artifacts/ directory or outside
Git. Research notes may retain curated aggregate findings and hashes.
Disagreement with a source mask is not automatically a model error or an annotation error. Inspect the image before proposing corrections. In particular, PV4GER array polygons sometimes bridge visible gaps between modules, while the project annotation guide specifies visible module surfaces. Relabelling changes the target and requires a separately versioned dataset; do not silently rewrite masks after seeing validation predictions.
This validation split already selected the checkpoint. Repeated inspection supports development, not independent final performance claims. The frozen test split remains reserved. New all-ignore roof candidates require a separate candidate prediction review; they cannot supply accuracy or false-positive measurements until their annotations are reviewed.
Developed and maintained by Valeford under the Spacement brand. Original project code: Apache-2.0. See the repository NOTICE for attribution.
Spacement PVExtent
- Home
- PVExtent Vidda vs. Tinden (v1.0 Releases)
- Getting started
- Dataset format
- Annotation guide
- PV4GER-SEG import
- Import audit
- Geographic splits
- Split audit
- Label review
- NRW candidates
- Bulk NRW training imagery
- Bulk mask curation
- Live training monitor
- Training quality exclusions
- Final bulk mask audit
- Experimental negative curation
- Negative curation audit
- Exploratory negative holdout
- Negative holdout audit
- Exploratory positive holdout
- Positive holdout audit
- Training smoke test
- Smoke audit
- Pretrained baseline training
- Baseline comparison
- Baseline comparison audit
- Six-epoch continuation audit
- V4 bulk training audit
- Domain-balanced training audit
- DeepLabV3+ ASPP architecture audit
- DeepLabV3+ Focal + Lovász loss audit
- DeepLabV3+ V5 Photometric Invariance audit
- CAD vectorization & rectilinear audit
- Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) audit
- Probability calibration & temperature scaling audit
- Seamless overlapping tiled inference & Hann blending audit
- Heterogeneous ensemble & quality triage audit
- Sealed 421 test benchmark audit
- 3D elevation & solar yield audit
- Multi-temporal 4D change detection audit
- Multispectral NIR & spectral signature audit
- Encoder weights and licenses
- Baseline audit
- Frozen validation errors
- Validation error audit
- Candidate predictions
- Research roadmap
Project