Skip to content

Conversation

heheda12345
Copy link
Collaborator

@heheda12345 heheda12345 commented Sep 12, 2025

Purpose

Harmony parser and built-in tool call are only used by gpt-oss now. And some of these PRs don't mention gpt-oss. So I want to add a label to filter these PRs.

Test Plan

Test Result


Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.
  • (Optional) Release notes update. If your change is user facing, please update the release notes draft in the Google Doc.

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
@mergify mergify bot added ci/build gpt-oss Related to GPT-OSS models labels Sep 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the mergify configuration to automatically add the gpt-oss label to pull requests related to harmony or built-in tool calls. The changes are logical, but I've identified a related file that was missed. I've provided a suggestion to include it and also to make the configuration more concise.

Comment on lines 129 to 133
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/harmony_utils.py
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool_server.py
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool.py
- title~=(?i)gpt[-_]?oss
- title~=(?i)harmony
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

To make this rule more comprehensive, I suggest adding vllm/reasoning/gptoss_reasoning_parser.py. This file is directly related to gpt-oss but is not covered by the existing or newly added rules.

Additionally, the two title conditions can be combined into a single regular expression for conciseness.

      - files~=^vllm/entrypoints/harmony_utils.py
      - files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool_server.py
      - files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool.py
      - files~=^vllm/reasoning/gptoss_reasoning_parser.py
      - title~=(?i)(gpt[-_]?oss|harmony)

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/harmony_utils.py
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool_server.py
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/tool.py
- files~=^vllm/entrypoints/context.py
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch! I've added this file.

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
@heheda12345 heheda12345 added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Sep 12, 2025
@jeejeelee jeejeelee merged commit 64d90c3 into vllm-project:main Sep 12, 2025
27 checks passed
skyloevil pushed a commit to skyloevil/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2025
…ted to builtin tool call (vllm-project#24717)

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
dsxsteven pushed a commit to dsxsteven/vllm_splitPR that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
…ted to builtin tool call (vllm-project#24717)

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
FeiDaLI pushed a commit to FeiDaLI/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
…ted to builtin tool call (vllm-project#24717)

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhang <zhangch99@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci/build gpt-oss Related to GPT-OSS models ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants