Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Verifiable Credentials JSON Schemas Specification #91

Closed
decentralgabe opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group

Comments

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Member

decentralgabe commented Oct 24, 2019

New Work Item Proposal

An extension to the Verifiable Credential Specification providing guidelines and examples for how to define and use a JSON Schema document as a VC Schema.

Include Link to Abstract or Draft

Sent out to the mailing list here.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2019Oct/att-0033/workday-credential-schemas.md

List Owners

@decentralgabe decentralgabe added the proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group label Oct 24, 2019
@kimdhamilton kimdhamilton added the action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting label Oct 24, 2019
@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @glcohen, we'll briefly discuss this work item proposal at the beginning of next CCG call (during the "action items and work items section")

@David-Chadwick
Copy link

David-Chadwick commented Oct 25, 2019 via email

@ottonomy
Copy link

+1 watching this and would like to participate. I've written a JSON-LD + JSON-schema implementation for Open Badges Extensions in the past, so I'm familiar with some of the thorniness of the problem space.

@jricher
Copy link

jricher commented Nov 1, 2019

This is definitely not fit for implementation guidelines -- this should really be part of a serialization specification. The VC data model spec has guidelines for what serializations need to provide, and this can do exactly that in its own spec.

@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

kimdhamilton commented Nov 2, 2019

@jandrieu please call on Kim during next CCG meeting to talk through this:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants