You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is the word "the" supposed to be there in the anchor? There are links out there (e.g. on MDN) pointing to a version without the "the", suggesting that in an earlier draft it wasn't there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's intentional, but not really necessary any longer. The spec-generator that spec previously used would generate id=background-position for the actual property definition, in the propdef table, and so we needed a different ID for the section so it wouldn't collide.
Now tho, the default ID that gets generated for the property is id=propdef-background-position instead, so it's not necessary to have the the- in it.
(The MDN specs were trying to point to the properties themselves, not the section.)
For example, the link for subsection 3.6, "Positioning images: the background-position property", is
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#the-background-position
Is the word "the" supposed to be there in the anchor? There are links out there (e.g. on MDN) pointing to a version without the "the", suggesting that in an earlier draft it wasn't there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: